Catalog Number 261221 |
Device Problem
Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/24/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An investigation has been initiated based on the reported information.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
A physician reported a perforator failed to disengage during a temporalis craniotomy.The physician reported the perforator stopped during procedure and the physician tried to pull it out, but it did not come out.The physician put effort into it, and the product was disassembled at the same time as it was removed, and the parts flew around.Tokibo eg1 was the manufacturer of the drill used with the perforator.It was unknown if the drill was an electric or pneumatic drill.It was not reported if the perforator clicked in place in the drill and it was unknown if the recommended spring tests were performed between each burr hole.No information of surgical delay was available.No adverse consequences to the patient was observed.Another product was used for the procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
N/a.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The perforator was returned for evaluation.Device history record (dhr) - there is no indication that the production process may have contributed to this complaint.All test results passed procedural specifications.Failure analysis - the perforator unit was inspected using the unaided eye.Unit came disassembled, no other anomalies were observed."ifu" testing procedure was performed with no observed anomalies.Functional testing was performed using the same protocol it underwent at finished goods testing prior to release.The unit was found to perform as intended and fulfilled the acceptance criteria.In the failure analysis that was performed, the returned unit was found to work as intended, and met all acceptance criteria.The complaint could not be verified through failure analysis.The root cause is undetermined and was unable to be confirmed in the complaint evaluation.Product was received for analysis and the investigation could not confirm the complaint.The risk remains acceptable per the risk analysis.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|