Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a supplemental medwatch report will be filed as appropriate.Device evaluation: the actual device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed, and it was determined that the device falling apart ¿ unattached was not confirmed.Therefore, an assignable root cause was not determined.However, the reported condition of unintended activation/motion was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be traced to user, which is user error.Udi: (b)(4).
|
It was reported by (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the cord, flex circuit, cable and locking components of the motor device were damaged.It was further observed that the device generated heat, and had an unintended activation/motion, component damage, and excessive noise.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for handpiece temperature assessment, air pump assessment, noise assessment, safety assessment, motor thermistor assessment, cable assessment, and visual assessment.It was noted in the service order that the device was pulled from the hose exposing the wires.It was further reported that the hose became completely detached from the handpiece.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of the event was unknown.However, it was reported that the event occurred in 2021.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|