• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG VENOVO VENOUS STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG VENOVO VENOUS STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK VENOVO VENOUS STENT SYSTEM
Device Problems Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/07/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.
 
Event Description
It was reported through an article "maldeployment of the venovo stent: a series of 2 documented instances", during deployment of venovo stent, several consecutive stent links failed to release, open, and expand along the iliac portion of the stent.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.Investigation summary: the physical sample was not available.The journal article contains images demonstrating an hour-glass like deformation of the stent inside the vessel which confirms that the stent adhered to the inner catheter stent brake during deployment which leads to a confirmed investigation result for expansion issue.A definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of the relevant instructions for use for this product was conducted.The instructions for use was found to address potential complications and adverse events such as incorrect positioning of the stent requiring further stenting or surgery, intimal injury, and malposition.H11: h6 (device, method, result, conclusion), h11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported through an article "maldeployment of the venovo stent: a series of 2 documented instances", during deployment of venovo stent, several consecutive stent links failed to release, open, and expand along the iliac portion of the stent.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.Investigation summary: the physical sample was not available.The journal article contains images demonstrating an hour-glass like deformation of the stent inside the vessel which confirms that the stent adhered to the inner catheter stent brake during deployment which leads to a confirmed investigation result for expansion issue.A definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of the relevant instructions for use for this product was conducted.The instructions for use was found to address potential complications and adverse events such as incorrect positioning of the stent requiring further stenting or surgery, intimal injury, and malposition.Jacob j bundy, david s shin, mark h meissner, eric j monroe and jeffrey forris beecham chick (2021).Maldeployment of the venovo stent: a series of 2 documented instances.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology, 32(5):781-783.Doi: 10.1016/j.Jvir.2021.02.003.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported in an article "maldeployment of the venovo stent: a series of 2 documented instances", during deployment of stent, several consecutive stent links failed to release, open, and expand along the iliac portion of the stent.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENOVO VENOUS STENT
Type of Device
VENOUS STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstr. 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM  76227
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstr. 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key11594289
MDR Text Key243740502
Report Number9681442-2021-00194
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QAN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P180037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK VENOVO VENOUS STENT SYSTEM
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/08/2021
Initial Date FDA Received03/31/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/09/2021
06/08/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/11/2021
06/24/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age25 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-