• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET CARDIOPULMONARY GMBH HLS SET ADVANCED 7.0; OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET CARDIOPULMONARY GMBH HLS SET ADVANCED 7.0; OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number BEQ-HLS 7050 USA#HLS SET ADVANCED 7.0
Device Problems Failure to Calibrate (2440); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 03/20/2021
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
A follow-up emdr will be submitted when additional information becomes available.Please note this case is connected to complaint#: (b)(4) (second hls set involved) which will be reported under emdr#: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer reported that during priming it was not possible to zero the pressures.Further the pump made an unusual noise during priming.While setting up another circuit the patient expired.See detailed description from customer below: "(b)(6) stated that she was requested to prime a cardiohelp circuit and provide for use in the er for a patient.A female patient with a date of birth was (b)(6).Suspected severe pulmonary embolism.Pamela described that the patient was obese.Patient weight was reported as (b)(6) kg but the patient height was not available.The patient was receiving chest compressions for two hours prior to attempting to place the patient onto cardiohelp therapy.(b)(6) stated she initially attempted to prime the hls circuit with lot number 7014365 on the cardiohelp console with serial number (b)(4).She stated that the circuit was dry but she was not able to zero the pressures.She abandoned attempting to zero the pressures and released the priming solution to prime the circuit via gravity.Once the prime by gravity was completed she set the rpms of the system to 3000 rpms and immediately started to hear a noise.She set the rpms to zero and then set the rpms to 3000 and heard the noise again.Due to this noise she set the rpms to zero, powered down the system and isolated it.Later she was able to replicate the noise and captured a video with sound of the noise.When i arrived on monday (b)(6) 2021 the pump and circuit were isolated and still attached.The circuit was still primed with solution and (b)(6) were able to show me that it was no longer making noise and was achieving flow.The circuit and pump are currently isolated in the perfusion office.I advised that i would be report this complaint and request a biohazard kit to be sent to the facility for the return of lot 70143635.I advised them that their biomed team could contact getinge service to request a pump inspection via their premier service plan for this pump via contract number (b)(4).Please note that this circuit and this pump was not used on the patient." please note this case is connected to complaint#: (b)(4) (second hls set involved) which will be reported under emdr#: (b)(4).Complaint id: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that the hls pump made unusual noises during priming and the pressure were not able to be zeroed.The device was not being used for treatment.The used cardiohelp is handled under complaint# (b)(4) (mfg report number 8010762-2021-00240).The user tried to prime a second hls set for the same patient and could not achieve any flow.That issue is handled under complaint# (b)(4) (hls, mfg report number 8010762-2021-00223) and (b)(4) (cardiohelp, mfg report number 8010762-2021-00241).The customer provided a video of the hls set in use.The reported noise was heard.Device history record: the production records of the affected hls module were reviewed on (b)(6) 2021.According to the final test results, the oxygenators with sn (b)(6) passed the tests as per specifications.Production related influences are unlikely to have contributed to the reported failure.Product investigation: for further investigation the hls set was send to ecri.The hls module was connected to a cardiohelp (complained under (b)(4)) and primed without any issue.No noise was noted during different flow and rpm settings.No malfunction could be confirmed.The involved cardiohelp (complaint# (b)(4)) was checked by a getinge service technician on (b)(6) 2021 and no noise or sound could be reproduced (refer service report (b)(4)).In addition the log files were reviewed by getinge engineering (life cycle engineering) and no error or issue could be determined.For further investigation the hls set was investigated by the getinge laboratory on (b)(6) 2021.Upon visual inspection no abnormalities were noticed.The hls set was primed and the functionality of the pump and sensors was tested.All pressure sensors could be zeroed and no unusual pump noise was found.The product worked according to its specifications, no issues were noticed.Medical evaluation: a medical review was performed by getinge medical affairs.Examinations of the cardiohelp system (sn (b)(6), a ch) by getinge and the ecri investigation of the second cardiohelp system (sn (b)(6), b ch) were not able to duplicate the issues reported by the customer in this complaint.Additionally, no performance issues with two differing disposables (a hls and b hls) could be identified in ecri tests.Moreover, no warnings, deficiencies, or low, medium, high, critical priority errors were shown in an examination of the user and service pool information by life cycle engineering.The complaints mentioned that the patient expired while waiting to be placed on support using the cardiohelp system; however, no evidentiary, direct (root) cause of the patient¿s expiration can be assigned to a malfunction of the cardiohelp system or to its associated disposables (hls set).In the absence of more details, it remains unclear if the events reported by the user (i.E.Noise, inability to zero the pressure sensors, and lack of flow) were due to either a single use error or combination of use errors.However, the possibility cannot be completely dismissed.Conclusion: while the review included an evaluation of technical, medical, trending and device history records (manufacturing); it could not be confirmed that the reported failures may be associated with a medical device malfunction.Additionally, the investigation results supported that the reported failures ¿pressure calibration issue¿ and ¿unusual noise¿ could not be confirmed.The occurrence rate was calculated for the reported failure and it was determined that this is not a systemic issue.Therefore, no remedial action is required.The occurrence rate related to the reported issue is currently being monitored as part of maquet cardiopulmonary¿ s trending program and additional investigations or corrections will be implemented in case of adverse trending.
 
Event Description
Complaint id: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HLS SET ADVANCED 7.0
Type of Device
OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET CARDIOPULMONARY GMBH
neue rottenburger strasse 37
hechingen
Manufacturer (Section G)
JULIA KAPFENBERGER
neue rottenburger strasse 37
hechingen
Manufacturer Contact
neue rottenburger strasse 37
hechingen 
MDR Report Key11594919
MDR Text Key243123870
Report Number3008355164-2021-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112360
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/23/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberBEQ-HLS 7050 USA#HLS SET ADVANCED 7.0
Device Catalogue Number70105.2794
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA12/23/2021
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/22/2021
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer12/23/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received03/31/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/22/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/23/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age41 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight143 KG
-
-