Model Number GYA-5 |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/11/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device referenced in this report has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is ongoing.The definitive cause of the user¿s experience cannot be determined at this time.This report will be updated upon completion of the investigation or upon receipt of additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is reported during a hysteroscopy using a 5fr grasper forceps, one side of the dislodged and was inside the patient.At the time of the report, the physician was in the process of removing the device fragment from the patient.There was no reported impact to the patient as a result of this occurrence.Multiple attempts to gather additional details regarding the patient/event have been made with no response from the customer.
|
|
Event Description
|
The issue occurred in the middle of a therapeutic procedure to remove an embedded intrauterine device (iud).The reported issue caused a >30 minute delay in the procedure.The procedure was completed with another unspecified device.The device is not available for return to olympus.There was no perforation, hemorrhage, or mucous membrane damage due to this occurrence.The jaw piece that dislodge was not removed found/removed from the patient, but it was present on x-ray.The physician stated the patient may need future x-ray and piece removal with repeat hysteroscopy.The device was inspected before use and no abnormalities were noted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted to report additional information provided by the customer.New information is reported in a2, a3, a4, b5, d4 (lot number), and d10.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The following sections were updated: d8, g3, g6, h2, h6, h10.Three unsuccessful attempts to retrieve a device history record (dhr), unique device identifier and manufacturing date have been made.Since there was no physical device evaluation and no dhr, a definitive root cause could not be determined.However, it is likely the jaw was dislodged due to the use of excessive force.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|