BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION UPHOLD VAGINAL SUPPORT SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number M0068317080 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Erosion (1750); Micturition Urgency (1871); Pain (1994); Urinary Retention (2119); Urinary Tract Infection (2120); Urinary Frequency (2275); Hematuria (2558); Dysuria (2684); Urinary Incontinence (4572); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 05/01/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Date of event: date of event was approximated to (b)(6) 2013, implant date, as no event date was reported.The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.(b)(4).The complaint device is not expected to be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold vaginal support system device was implanted into the patient during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2013.As reported by the patient's attorney, the patient experienced an unknown injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold vaginal support system device was implanted into the patient during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2013.As reported by the patient's attorney, the patient started seeing a physician in (b)(6) 2019 due to symptoms.It was reported that after the implantation, the patient experienced erosion of the sling into the bladder and urinary retention with recurrent urinary tract infections, incomplete bladder emptying, hematuria, burning sensation when urinating, pelvic and vaginal pain, overactive bladder, frequent urination and incontinence.Consequently, on (b)(6) 2020, the implanted sling was completely removed.The patient tolerated the procedure well and transferred to recovery room in good condition.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: blocks b3: date of event, d6b: explant date and h6: patient codes and impact codes.Block b3 date of event: the exact event onset date is unknown; however, it was reported that the patient started seeing a physician in (b)(6) 2019 due to symptoms.Therefore, the event date has been approximated to (b)(6) 2019.Blocks d4, h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.Block e1: this event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The mesh removal surgeon is: (b)(6).Block h6: patient codes e2006, e1309, e1310, e1302, e1301 and e2330 capture the reportable events of erosion, urinary retention, uti, hematuria, dysuria and pain.Impact code f1903 captures the reportable event of complete sling removal.Conclusion code d17 is being used in lieu of an adequate conclusion code for device not returned.Block h10: the removed mesh is not expected to be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|