• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD RAPID DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VERITOR¿; CORONAVIRUS ANTIGEN DETECTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD RAPID DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VERITOR¿; CORONAVIRUS ANTIGEN DETECTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 256082
Device Problem Expiration Date Error (2528)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/23/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Eua # (b)(4).Medical device expiration date: unknown.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.Device manufacture date: unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported while testing for sars-cov-2 it was discovered that 8 patients were tested with expired kits.3 of the 8 patient results were confirmed by pcr test method.Customer stated confirmatory testing will not be performed on remaining 5 patients.Eua # (b)(4).The following information was provided by the initial reporter: it was reported that the customer did not realize the kits have an expiry date so an expired kit was used to test on some patients.Additionally, the bd sales consultant provided the following additional information: followed up with the customer today.Spoke with customer and she stated she never heard back from their distributor about what lot number of product 256082 they received.She asked to go ahead and close the case.Recommended to the customer that they follow up with those patients for re-testing.Shipment method (directly or via distributor): distributor.If it is a distributor ¿ who is it? mckesson.Called the customer today to follow up.She stated that they investigated the incident a little further and provided the updated information below.She also stated that 3 out of the 8 test results were confirmed by pcr but they will not be conducting any re-tests on the other 5 patients.The box of the expired kits were already discarded so she doesn't have the kit lot number available but she is waiting to hear from their distributor if they have it in their records.I will follow up with the customer in a couple of days for the kit lot number.Quantity received and quantity affected: 8 out of 30.If consumable is tested on bd instrumentation, list serial numbers: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: investigation summary: this memo is to summarize the investigation results regarding your complaint that alleges expired material when using bd kit rapid detection of sars-cov-2 veritor (material # 256082), batch number unknown.Bd quality performs a systematic approach to investigate expired material complaints.This approach involves review of manufacturing batch history records, testing of retention samples, and testing of customer returned samples, if applicable.An investigation could not be performed as no batch number was provided.There are no current trends against expired material complaints.Bd quality will continue to closely monitor for trends.
 
Event Description
It was reported while testing for sars-cov-2 it was discovered that 8 patients were tested with expired kits.3 of the 8 patient results were confirmed by pcr test method.Customer stated confirmatory testing will not be performed on remaining 5 patients.Eua # (b)(4).The following information was provided by the initial reporter: it was reported that the customer did not realize the kits have an expiry date so an expired kit was used to test on some patients.Additionally, the bd sales consultant provided the following additional information: followed up with the customer today.Spoke with customer and she stated she never heard back from their distributor about what lot number of product 256082 they received.She asked to go ahead and close the case.Recommended to the customer that they follow up with those patients for re-testing.Shipment method (directly or via distributor): distributor.If it is a distributor ¿ who is it? mckesson.Called the customer today to follow up.She stated that they investigated the incident a little further and provided the updated information below.She also stated that 3 out of the 8 test results were confirmed by pcr but they will not be conducting any re-tests on the other 5 patients.The box of the expired kits were already discarded so she doesn't have the kit lot number available but she is waiting to hear from their distributor if they have it in their records.I will follow up with the customer in a couple of days for the kit lot number.Quantity received and quantity affected: 8 out of 30.If consumable is tested on bd instrumentation, list serial numbers: (b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD RAPID DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VERITOR¿
Type of Device
CORONAVIRUS ANTIGEN DETECTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
brett wilko
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key11686426
MDR Text Key246100190
Report Number1119779-2021-00675
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QKP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/06/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/19/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number256082
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/06/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-