• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE APC 2; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE APC 2; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number APC 2
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Bowel Perforation (2668)
Event Date 03/26/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The apc/esu system was returned and thoroughly inspected/tested.The apc/esu system was returned and thoroughly inspected/tested.A review of the chronological data at the time of the event didn't show that there were any equipment problems during the procedure.Then, a technical safety check was performed on each unit.This included an electrical safety check, a function check of each of the equipment's features, and a power output check.Also, the gas flow rates were measured and found to be within their acceptable ranges for the apc.All features were/are functioning properly within specifications on both devices [note: unrelated to the reported issue, the esu was updated to the software version (b)(4).This is typical routine service work.].In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history records (dhrs) for the apc and esu.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the event.Most likely, there were many factors involved in the reported incident.Specifically, as reported the patient's condition of being high risk for the interventional work was a significant factor in the event.Nevertheless, upon the intervention, the remaining tissue of the bowl did not stay intact which resulted in the perforation.The account is being made aware of the findings.To further address the issue, additional in-service work was offered to the medical staff at the hospital; however, it was declined as they are very experienced users.No trends have been identified.Erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Event Description
It was reported that an erbe system, argon plasma coagulator (apc)/electrosurgical unit (esu/generator, model vio 300 d, part number (p/n) 10140-100, serial number (b)(4)) system was involved in a patient incident upon a colonoscopy.The apc/esu system was used with a filter integrated argon plasma coagulation (fiapc) probe.The equipment settings were pusled apc mode, effect 2, 20 watts, 0.5 liters per minute (lpm) flow rate.Per the account, the patient was high risk for the interventional work.Specifically, patient had multiple comorbidities like strictures, being very elderly, etc.Upon the interventional work a perforation occurred.To address the issue, surgery was performed to close the perforation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE APC 2
Type of Device
ARGON PLASMA COAGULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM  
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-9317
7709554400
MDR Report Key11694030
MDR Text Key257216986
Report Number9610614-2021-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K024047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/20/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberAPC 2
Device Catalogue Number10134-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/09/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/31/2021
Initial Date FDA Received04/20/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/14/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age89 YR
-
-