• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC DRIVER; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC DRIVER; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 9735024
Device Problems Imprecision (1307); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/31/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient weight not available from the site.No parts have been received by the manufacturer for evaluation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information regarding a navigation system being used in a procedure.It was reported that the health care professional (hcp) was performing a hardware removal of l2-3 and reinstrumentation of l2-4.  they removed a 7.5 x 55mm screw from the left l3 pedicle and opted to replace it with an 8.5x55mm screw using solera 5.5/6.0.  as they were advancing the 8.5x55mm screw, they noted that the purchase of the screw was significant.  the screw was advanced and they moved onto the right side using a 7.5x55mm screw.  then they went back to the left l3 pedicle screw to advance it a few more millimeters.  when they did this, the tip of the navigation screw driver broke off in the t25 portion of the screw head.  they were able to retrieve the broken piece after several attempts, and both pieces were accounted for.No further information was received.Additional information was received stating that the health care professional was extending the construct to include an adjacent level. they felt as though the 7.5x55mm screw that was removed did not have adequate purchase and therefore opted for a larger diameter screw.This was not a revision procedure the screw was not misplaced. the type of procedure that was being performed was removal of hardware l2-3, l2-4 posterior spine fusion with plif at l3-4. there was a delay of approximately 10-15 minutes.Navigation was not aborted and there were no adverse events that occurred with the patient.The site used a new screw driver once the one they were using broke.The potential cause of the reported issue was that the navigated drivers should be reverse threaded in the tulip.  the manufacturer representative believes that the soft tissue contact with the driver shaft loosened the interface between the threaded portion and the screw. this places increased load on the t25 driver tip and ultimately so much load that it failed. .
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DRIVER
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer Contact
david gustafson
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635149628
MDR Report Key11700891
MDR Text Key247020000
Report Number1723170-2021-01068
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K124004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/21/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/21/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model Number9735024
Device Catalogue Number9735024
Device Lot Number200601
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/31/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-