Evaluation of technical success, efficacy, and safety of portomesenteric venous intervention following nontransplant hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery.Purpose: to evaluate technical success, efficacy and safety of portomesenteric venous (pmv) intervention for pmv stenosis or occlusion following nontransplant hepatobiliary or pancreatic (hpb) surgery.Materials and methods: a retrospective review identified 42 patients (mean age 60 y) with pmv stenosis (n = 33; 79%) or occlusion (n = 9; 21%) who underwent attempted pmv intervention following hpb surgery between june 1, 2011, and april 1, 2018.Main outcomes were technical success, primary patency rates, and complications.Technical success was compared by venous pathology and primary pmv patency based on anticoagulation status after the procedure using fisher exact test.Rates of primary patency by stent group were estimated using kaplan-meier method.The article notes: occlusion that occurred which could potentially be associated with one or more of the eleven gore® viabahn® vbx balloon expandable endoprostheses devices implanted.
|
Literature citation: vamshi k.Mugu, scott m.Thompson, chad j.Fleming, lavanya yohanathan, mark j.Truty, michael l.Kendrick, james c.Andrews, evaluation of technical success, efficacy, and safety of portomesenteric venous intervention following nontransplant hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery, journal of vascular and interventional radiology, volume 31, issue 3, 2020, pages 416-424.E2, issn 1051-0443, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Jvir.2019.08.011.Patient information was obtained by patient demographics provided in the article.Additionally, the majority of patients with reported device occlusion underwent repeat device placement; therefore, this reintervention is listed as patient outcome for h6: health effect - impact code.
|