• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SENTINEL CEREBRAL PROTECTION SYSTEM (US); EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SENTINEL CEREBRAL PROTECTION SYSTEM (US); EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number CMS15-10C-US
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Difficult to Remove (1528); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/09/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: analysis of returned product revealed that the 6f non-boston scientific (bsc) introducer sheath could not be removed from the sentinel device due to the severely damaged condition of the 6f non-bsc introducer sheath (buckling/accordioned and detached from its hub) and due to the severely damaged condition of the articulating distal sheath (ads) (severely kinked with pinch marks along its length) of the sentinel embolic protection system.The ads responded when turning articulating knob (#2); however, could not reached it full straight position due to its severe damaged condition; consequently, confirming the reported complaint.Additionally, the distal filter slider (#3) is bent/kinked and the distal filter was able to be un-sheathed using distal filter slider (#3) by removing the kink on it and it was found severely damaged, the tri-layer is missing and the distal filter is detached from the distal tip.The coupler was found stretched.
 
Event Description
Reportable based on returned device analysis completed (b)(6) 2021.It was reported that difficulty removing through the introducer sheath occurred.Vascular access was obtained via a transradial approach.A 6f non-boston scientific (bsc) introducer sheath was placed.A sentinel embolic protection system was positioned and both filters deployed.The transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure was successfully completed.The distal and proximal filters of the sentinel embolic protection system were sheathed.When the sentinel embolic protection system was exiting the 6f non-bsc introducer sheath, the physician felt resistance.The sentinel embolic protection system and the 6f introducer sheath were removed together.Outside the patient, a kink and damage was found on the 6f non-bsc introducer sheath.No patient complications were reported.Returned device analysis found a detached distal filter.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENTINEL CEREBRAL PROTECTION SYSTEM (US)
Type of Device
EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
160 knowles drive
los gatos CA 95032
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key11726637
MDR Text Key247515938
Report Number2134265-2021-05262
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PUM
UDI-Device Identifier00863229000004
UDI-Public00863229000004
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K192460
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/26/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/26/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/08/2022
Device Model NumberCMS15-10C-US
Device Catalogue NumberCMS15-10C-US
Device Lot Number0026153812
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/03/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/30/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/08/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age88 YR
-
-