The icd was not returned for analysis.The analysis is therefore based on the inspection of the quality documents associated with the manufacture of this particular device as well as on the returned device data.The memory content of the device was inspected.The inspection of the device data revealed the eos battery status and 45 charging cycles within 13 minute's on (b)(6) 2021 were documented to the devices memory.Charging cycles 34 and 41 were aborted due to magnet application.The last charging cycle was aborted at 8:26h by activation of the eos battery status.An evaluation of the device data after reset showed no indication for a device malfunction.Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that an unfavorable magnet application may have contributed to the clinical observation.An unfavorable orientation as well as a short distance between the magnet and the device during a charging cycle may lead to such rare clinical events.When there is a short distance between the magnet and the icd, and the orientation of the magnet is aligned to cause the magnetic field to be strongest over the high voltage transformer, a saturation of the transformer may appear only during a charging cycle, leading to a temporary drop of the supply voltage below the eos level, resulting in the observed eos battery status.This anomaly does not represent a battery or hybrid malfunction.This status is only achieved with the combination of an exact position of the magnet over the high voltage transformer, and the reduced distance from device to magnet during a charging cycle.In addition the manufacturing process for this device was re-investigated and all production steps were performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process which may be related to the clinical observation.There was no indication of a material or manufacturing problem.
|