• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. SUTURE UNKNOWN; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. SUTURE UNKNOWN; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Fever (1858); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
Event Date 04/20/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details, demographics regarding the additional events.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details, demographics regarding the additional events.Citation: zhongguo gu shang/china j orthop trauma,2014,27(10):809-814 ; (b)(6).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Title: titanium elastic nail versus plate-screw fixation for the treatment of upper segment fractures of femoral shaft in children this prospective study aimed to compare the complications and clinical outcome of titanium elastic nail (ten) versus plate-screw fixation (pf) for the treatment of upper segment fractures of femoral shaft in children.From january 2006 to august 2012, 32 children ages 3-12 years old with middle and upper segment femoral fractures were randomly selected for treatment with titanium elastic nail (ten) and plate-screw fixation (pf).Ninteen patients were treated with titanic elastic nail (ten) fixation including 11 males and 8 females with an average age of (6.9 ± 2.2) years old ranging from 3 to 11, 11 cases of them were type a, 6 cases were type b,2 cases were type c according to ao classification.The other 13 patients were treated with plate-screw fixation (pf) including 9 males and 4 females with an average age of (7.5 ± 2.1) years old ranging from 5 to 12 years, and 3 cases of them were type a,6 cases were type b,2 cases were type c.Skin was sutured with absorbable suture (produced by johnson & johnson, usa) for both groups.Operative time, blood loss,incision length,the time of hospitalization,fracture healing time, postoperative complications and function recovery between two groups were compared and evaluated.Reported complications in the titanium elastic nail (ten) group included superficial infection of incision (n=1), nail tail irritation (n=2), limb length inequality (n=3), angulation deformity (n=1), pain at the site of nail tail implantation (n=2), fever (n=?) and rotational deformity (n=1).Reported complications in the plate-screw fixation (pf) group included limb length inequality (n=2) and fever (n=?).Antibiotics were given intravenously 30 minutes before the operation and 1-3 days after the operation to prevent infection, and the patients with a fever were treated with anti-infection therapy.Superficial infection was cured after dressing change, nail tail irritation was cured when the internal fixation was removed after fracture healing and pain disappeared after removing the intramedullary nail.All the patients were followed up after the operation.The follow-up time of the titanium elastic nail group was 15 - 48 months, with an average of 25.3 months; the follow-up time of the plate-screw fixation group was 13 - 36 months, with an average of 21.6 months.There was no significant difference in the operation time, duration of hospital stay, removal time of internal fixation or fracture healing time between the titanium elastic nail group and the plate-screw fixation group (p > 0.05), but there were significant differences in the intraoperative blood loss and the incision length between the two groups (p < 0.05).There was no statistically difference in postoperative in complication between two groups, but the patients in ten group had a higher incidence of soft tissue irritation and misalignment.Outcome scores according to sanders had no significant difference between two groups (p>0.05).In ten group,the result was excellent in 13 cases, good in 3,fair in 2, and poor in 1, while in pf group excellent in 10, good in 2, fair in 1.In conclusion, with titanium elastic nail and plate-screw fixation, good bone healing and functional recovery in the treatment of children with middle and upper segment femoral fractures can be achieved, and both methods have their own advantages.The surgical treatment should be based on the children¿s age, weight, the wishes of the children¿s family members, the scar size, the fracture stability, the degree of comminution, the distance between the fracture and the trochanter, complications and other factors after comprehensive analysis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUTURE UNKNOWN
Type of Device
SUTURE, ABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
MDR Report Key11732409
MDR Text Key247520546
Report Number2210968-2021-03832
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GAK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/14/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/27/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/14/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-