The esu was returned and thoroughly inspected/tested.The evaluation included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features and a power output check.The generator was/is within specifications and all features were/are functioning properly.In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history record (dhr) of the involved device.Based upon the findings, no equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the event.Most likely, there were many factors involved in the reported incident.Specifically, upon the intervention, the remaining tissue of the bowl did not stay intact which resulted in the perforation.In conclusion, no determination could be made as to the cause of the event.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
|
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator) upon a colonoscopy.The esu was used with a split return electrode (erbe nessy omega pad, part number 20193-082, lot number unknown).A description of the other accessories used in the procedure was not provided.Additionally, information regarding the procedural settings was not conveyed.During the polypectomy in the sigmoid colon, there was thermal damage of the intestinal wall.Then, it came to a delayed perforation.To address the perforation, a laparoscopy was performed to stitch over/close the area.The patient had to stay in the hospital for some additional days.
|