• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 200 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 200 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 200 D
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Bowel Perforation (2668)
Event Date 04/13/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The esu was returned and thoroughly inspected/tested.The evaluation included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features and a power output check.The generator was/is within specifications and all features were/are functioning properly.In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history record (dhr) of the involved device.Based upon the findings, no equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the event.Most likely, there were many factors involved in the reported incident.Specifically, upon the intervention, the remaining tissue of the bowl did not stay intact which resulted in the perforation.In conclusion, no determination could be made as to the cause of the event.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator) upon a colonoscopy.The esu was used with a split return electrode (erbe nessy omega pad, part number 20193-082, lot number unknown).A description of the other accessories used in the procedure was not provided.Additionally, information regarding the procedural settings was not conveyed.During the polypectomy in the sigmoid colon, there was thermal damage of the intestinal wall.Then, it came to a delayed perforation.To address the perforation, a laparoscopy was performed to stitch over/close the area.The patient had to stay in the hospital for some additional days.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 200 D
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM  
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-9317
7709554400
MDR Report Key11752499
MDR Text Key248175372
Report Number9610614-2021-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K083452
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 200 D
Device Catalogue Number10140-200
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/21/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/20/2021
Initial Date FDA Received04/30/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/13/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age41 YR
Patient Weight80
-
-