(b)(4).Initial/final mdr report combined.Report source, foreign - event occurred in (b)(6).No product was returned or pictures provided; visual and dimensional evaluations could not be performed.Part and lot identification are necessary for review of device history records, neither were provided.Device is used for treatment.Insufficient information provided.Unable to perform a compatibility check.Complaint history review cannot be performed without product identification.Medical records were not provided.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.No corrective actions, preventive actions, or field actions resulted after investigation of this event.If any additional information becomes available, then the complaint will be reopened and investigated thoroughly.
|
We have received a manuscript titled, the effect of age on the outcomes of cementless mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements.Authors to be confirmed: h mohammad, d w murray et al, 2020.The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of age on the outcomes of cementless ukrs.Unicompartmental knee replacements (ukr) are being performed in patients with increasing demands and life expectancies with concerns that cement fixation will not last.Cementless fixation may offer a solution, but the long term results in different age groups has not been assessed.A prospective cohort of 1000 medial cementless mobile bearing ukr were analysed.Patients were categorised into four groups (<55, 55 to <65, 65 to <75 and >75 years).Implant survival was assessed using endpoints reoperation, revision and major revision requiring revision knee replacement components.Functional outcomes were assessed.The study reported various revision procedures and re-operations which are listed below: age group < 55 years; number of reoperations - 6; number of revision - 3; details of reoperations/revisions indication for surgery: 2 bearing exchange - 2 bearing dislocations; 2 arthroscopies - 1 for pain and 1 for knee swelling; 1 open debridement, lavage and bearing exchange - infection: 1 washout debridement and; closure - wound dehiscence.Age group 55 to <65 years: number of reoperations - 7; number of revision - 4, details of reoperations/revisions indication for surgery: 1 tkr - lateral tibial plateau fracture; 1 lateral ukr - disease progression; 2 arthroscopies - 1 for pain and 1 for lateral meniscal tear; 1 arthroscopy and washout - suspected infection; 1 cemented femoral component - femoral component loosening, revision: 1 tibial component revision - pain.Age group 65 to <75 years: number of reoperations - 11; number of revision - 9, details of reoperations/revisions indication for surgery: 3 bearing exchange - bearing dislocation; 1 dair and bearing exchange - suspected infection; 3 lateral ukrs - disease progression; 2 tkrs - 1 for pain and 1 for disease progression; 1 arthroscopy and arthrotomy - loose body; 1 aspiration and mua - pain and intermittent swelling/stiffness.Age group >75 years: number of reoperations - 6; number of revision - 6, details of reoperations/revisions indication for surgery: 3 bearing exchange - bearing dislocation; 1 lateral ukr - tibial avn; 1 tkr - disease progression; 1 patellofemoral replacement - pain.The cementless mobile bearing ukr has similar very low 10-year reoperation, revision and major revision rates and similar excellent clinical outcomes in all age groups.Cementless ukr should be used in all age groups and age should not be considered a contraindication.
|