• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN CAGE/SPACER; ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DDD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN CAGE/SPACER; ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DDD Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Non-union Bone Fracture (2369); Osteolysis (2377)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
510k: this report is for an unknown cougar system/unknown lot.Part and lot number are unknown.Without the specific part number; the udi number and 510-k number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: rentenberger, c.Et al.(2020), perioperative risk factors for early revisions in stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion, world neurosurgery, vol.134, pages e657-e663 (usa).The objective of this study is to determine perioperative factors that increase the risk of early revisions after standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (sa-llif).From 2007 to 2016, a total of 133 patients underwent an sa-llif procedure.They were divided into 2 groups.Nonrevision group which had 108 patients (41 males and 67 females) with a mean age of 66.3 years and revision group which had 25 patients (10 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 68.6 years.Implants used were the cougar system (depuy synthes, raynham, massachusetts, usa).The following complications were reported as follows: 68% of patients had revision surgery for symptoms of pain.16% of patients had revision surgery for radiographic adjacent segment disease.16% of patients had revision surgery for pseudarthrosis.8% of patients had revision surgery for hardware failure.A total of 189 levels were categorized as mild subsidence (grade 0-i) and 69 levels as severe subsidence (grade ii-iii).This report is for an unknown synthes cougar system.This report captures the reported pain, radiographic adjacent segment disease and pseudarthrosis.This is report 1 of 3 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN CAGE/SPACER
Type of Device
ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DDD
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INT SPINE
chemin blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ   02400
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
6103142063
MDR Report Key11851802
MDR Text Key255954868
Report Number1526439-2021-01004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/21/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/19/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/21/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-