The device was returned for analysis.The reported difficulty to advance was not confirmed/ tested as it cannot be replicated due to anatomy.The reported kink was not confirmed.There was additional noted damage to the shaft as it was separated and exposed misaligned coils and a bent core.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed no indication of a lot specific product quality issue.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties appear to be due to circumstances of the procedure.It is likely that anatomical conditions contributed to the reported difficulty advancing.Additionally, the damage noted to the delivery catheter and barewire coils is likely contributed to failed attempt to reach the desired location as reported.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a heavily calcified lesion in the right internal carotid artery.An emboshield nav6 embolic protection system (eps) was advanced; however, resistance with the anatomy was felt.Once at the desired location, it was noted that distal part of the deliver catheter was kinked.Upon noticing this, the delivery catheter and the filter were retrieved without attempting to deploy the filter.Another emboshield nav6 eps was used to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.The returned device analysis identified that the shaft of the delivery catheter was separated 1mm proximal to the distal marker.No additional information was provided.
|