It was reported in a journal article with title: anterior needle-guided mesh in advanced pelvic organ prolapse:apical fixation on sacrospinous ligaments.The objective of this study is to evaluate whether anterior¿apical compartment mesh implants for pelvic floor reconstruction might be safely and effectively anchored to the sacro-spinous (ss) ligaments instead of the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis (atfp).The ss ligaments as anchoring structures for centro-apical support mesh fixation are thought to be stronger than the atfp and we presumed that anterior mesh fixation to the ss ligament might be feasible, safe and effective.This study, started on january 2009 and closed on october 2011, was designed to be open and prospective.Of 72 patients who were asked to participate in this study, 44 had rather un-palpable atfp, and ss ligament fixation was performed.The mean follow-up duration was 12 months.The mesh used here was prolift+ m1 anterior (gynecare, summerville, usa).Apical ss ligament fixation was chosen whenever the atfp was found by an experienced surgeon to be poor to the extent of being difficult to palpate, making it clearly inappropriate for mesh fixation.All patients were given 1 g monocef1 (cefonicid, beecham healthcare) intravenously one hour prior to surgery.They all underwent an iodine antiseptic vaginal wash before the surgery.Patients presenting with additional posterior vaginal wall relaxation had either posterior colporrhaphy or posterior pelvic floor mesh augmentation reconstructive surgery (by prosima1 or prolift + m1, gynecare, somerville, usa), depending on the severity of the herniation process.Mild degrees of prolapse were treated with native tissue colporrhaphy, moderate degrees with single incision small mesh, and advanced prolapse was treated with needle guided large mesh.Anti-incontinence surgery was added when indicated, using tvt obturator, tvt-secur or tvt-abbrevo (gynecare, somerville, usa), according with surgeon¿s preference.Patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months after the surgery and at study conclusion, with the last patient having 10 months of post-operative follow-up as well.Reported complications included urgency (n=12), frequency (n=12) and nocturia (n=12) were all found to be reduced significantly, and so was the sexual discomfort rate(n=6) fecal incontinence (n=1), pelvic pain (n=4) and constipation(n=1) rates were reduced.In conclusion this rather small study suggests that anterior pelvic floor meshes might be anchored safely and successfully to the ss ligament, aiming to achieve improved centro-apical support of the vaginal apex and the anterior wall by an anterior pelvic floor approach.
|