• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SEPX-8-6-40-135
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/16/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the device returned loosely coiled in a biohazard bag within a zip lock bag.No procedural images were received for evaluation.Device was decontaminated with cidex opa solution soak and tergazyme soak.The protégé rx sds was received with the stent partially deployed and with a bend on the pushrod.The bending found on the device may have occurred during shipping of the device to the lab.The device was returned with bunching/damage approximately 20 mm and kink approximately 55mm.From strain relief.During functional testing the stent could not be deployed due to the condition of the returned device.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Physician intended to use a protégé rx carotid stent system with a spider fx embolic protection device with a non-medtronic 8fr sheath during treatment of a 30mm calcified lesion in the patient¿s mid common carotid artery.Moderate vessel calcification and tortuosity are reported.Lesion exhibited 90% stenosis.Artery diameter reported as 6mm.There was no damage noted to the product packaging prior to use.No issues were noted when removing the device from the packaging.Ifu was followed and the device was prepped without issue.The thumbscrew/lock-pin was checked for securement prior to procedure.Pre-dilation was not performed.The device was not passed through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was encountered during delivery to the lesion and excessive force was used.The lock-pin was removed when entering the patient¿s vasculature entering the sheath.Deployment issues are reported.The physician advanced the device to the lesion and when attempting to deploy noted that the delivery rod was withdrawn, and resistance was felt.Two unsuccessful attempts were made to deploy the stent.The physician was concerned any further attempts would affect the blood vessels and removed the device from the patient and replaced with a device of the same size and model to complete the procedure successf ully.No patient injury reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708734
MDR Report Key11927855
MDR Text Key254087780
Report Number2183870-2021-00201
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P060001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/03/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/03/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/01/2021
Device Catalogue NumberSEPX-8-6-40-135
Device Lot NumberA939861
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/28/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/01/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/02/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age67 YR
-
-