• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE - EXACT UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE - EXACT UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hematoma (1884); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 03/11/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #: (b)(4).This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Citation: int urogynecol j (2017); 28:1567¿1572.Doi 10.1007/s00192-017-3310-y.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that the ethicon product (tension free vaginal tape - exact) involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon product involved? patient demographics.
 
Event Description
It was reported in a journal article with title: two techniques for assessing postoperative voiding function, a randomized trial.The primary outcome of this parallel non-blinded, randomized controlled trial was to hypothesize that an or-initiated retrograde vt after outpatient mid-urethral sling placement, with or without an anterior repair, would decrease total pacu time compared with a retrograde vt initiated in the pacu.Secondary outcomes included assessing patient satisfaction with the two vt methods and assessing voiding parameters, including the risk for overdistention.Between november 2011 and april 2014, a total of 59 women who were planning to undergo mid-urethral sling placement with no history of previous incontinence surgery were included in the study.30 women (mean age = 52.0 ± 9.7 years; bmi = 29.0 ± 6.0) were assigned to the or-fill group and 29 women (mean age = 54.6 ± 13.1; bmi = 29.3 ± 4.7) to the pacu-fill group.Tvt-exact (ethicon) retropubic slings was used in 18 patients in the or-fill group and 19 patients in the pacu-fill group, while the rest of the patients used a competitor device.Reported complications included failed in vt (n=?); pain report after vt based on median vas scores (n=?); median post void residual of 386.5 or 250 (n=?); dissatisfaction (n=?); postoperative hematoma (n=1) that resolved spontaneously; infection at the retropubic trocar site (n=1), which resolved with antibiotic treatment.All postoperative voiding dysfunction (n=?) resolved before the 6-week postoperative visit, and no sling revisions were performed.In conclusion, or-fill vt did not decrease total pacu time compared with pacu-fill vt; however, time to vt initiation was decreased and no subjects were found to have overdistention.If a vt can be performed earlier in the recovery period, this may offer the potential to explore other opportunities for faster discharge.Additionally, it may allow for an earlier second attempt at vt for women who fail the first vt.Given the high rate of short-term urinary retention after mid-urethral sling in our patient population, optimizing the postoperative vt technique is essential.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE - EXACT UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON SARL-NEUCHATEL
puits-godet 20
neuchatel 2000
SZ   2000
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
MDR Report Key11929016
MDR Text Key266935515
Report Number2210968-2021-05201
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K132054
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/05/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/05/2021
Initial Date FDA Received06/03/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-