• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DIASORIN S.P.A. LIAISON SARS-COV-2 S1/S2 IGG; QUALITATIVE DETECTION OF IGG ANTIBODIES TO SARS-COV-2

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DIASORIN S.P.A. LIAISON SARS-COV-2 S1/S2 IGG; QUALITATIVE DETECTION OF IGG ANTIBODIES TO SARS-COV-2 Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 311460
Device Problem False Positive Result (1227)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Diasorin (b)(4) received a complaint from a customer stating that the liaison sars-cov-2 s1/s2 igg assay did not pass their specificity study.The customer stated they had 100 pre-covid samples, collected from september to october 2019, and six of them resulted positive with diasorin assay (94% specificity), whereas they were negative with three other platforms (abbott, roche and beckman).Positive and negative results were based on comparison to another method.Diasorin assay and clinical performance were based on clinical sensitivity defined by pcr positive and analyzed depending on the days from diagnosis.Moreover, according to literature there is not a consensus on when the pandemic began, therefore without a pcr result these patients cannot be confirmed as negative at that time.Data were analysed and the complained samples were identified.All samples were retested obtaining repeatedly positive results.Diasorin controls were tested on the relevant routine days and fell within manufacturer's ranges.Maintenance was performed according to recommendations.It was suggested to pay attention to pre-analytical steps, centrifugation setting and sample appearance.The complaint was classified as confirmed.No clear root cause could be identified and probable causes could be instrument- or handling-related.The performances of the liaison sars-cov-2 s1/s2 igg assay were confirmed to be coherent with the claimed one.
 
Event Description
In light of the covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent authorizations (euas) for sars-cov-2 diagnostics tests and per the conditions of the emergency use authorization, suspected false negatives, false positives and significant changes in expected performance characteristics will be reported under 21 cfr 803.The alleged false test results in this event have not caused patient injury or death; however, this event is being reported conservatively because if the alleged malfunction were to recur there is a non-remote potential for serious injury or death.Diasorin (b)(4) received a complaint from a customer stating that the liaison sars-cov-2 s1/s2 igg assay did not pass their specificity study.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIAISON SARS-COV-2 S1/S2 IGG
Type of Device
QUALITATIVE DETECTION OF IGG ANTIBODIES TO SARS-COV-2
Manufacturer (Section D)
DIASORIN S.P.A.
via crescentino snc
saluggia, vercelli 13040
IT  13040
Manufacturer (Section G)
DIASORIN S.P.A.
via crescentino snc
saluggia, vercelli 13040
IT   13040
Manufacturer Contact
barbara belluati
via crescentino snc
saluggia, vercelli 13040
IT   13040
MDR Report Key11989080
MDR Text Key259104376
Report Number9610240-2021-00035
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QKO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/06/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/13/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/11/2020
Device Catalogue Number311460
Device Lot Number358005
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/01/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/29/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-