Other, other text: h6: event problem and evaluation codes: updated after device evaluation.H10: device evaluation: the breathing circuit and the breathing bag were returned for investigation.A visual inspection and functional test were performed.Visual inspection results: when observing the surface of the anesthesia bag, it was confirmed that there was a tear inside the center of the bag.Conclusion: the reported event was confirmed.Root cause: the root cause may be due to manufacturing.Review of manufacturing records, relevant to the lot reported, found no discrepancies or anomalies.Actions: the sample was sent to mtij for further investigation.Mtij testing/inspection: one unit was returned for evaluation of the failure.Unit returned was received inside of a plastic bag which is not the original package.The non-conformity as pinhole in the breathing bag is confirmed.Current process review: leak test inspection was performed in the piece returned through the equipment id 8.0618.Specification qp dabb rev.009.Results: piece returned was detectable as rejectable.Conclusion: it is concluded that failure reported could not be reproduced using the tools from assembly and packaging process.Cannot confirm the failure, the most probable root cause is that pinholes occurred after the product left smiths medical facilities.The cause of the reported problem was traced to the user manipulation of the device during usage.No corrective actions were taken since the investigation did not reveal that the defect was caused during the manufacturing process.
|