Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Description of event: as reported, the tip of a ncircle tipless stone extractor separated while in the patient during a ureteroscopy.No unintended section of the device remained inside of the patient's body.The physician removed the broken tip using a three-pronged grasper through a flexible ureteroscope.No additional procedures were required due to the occurrence.No adverse effects were reported due to the occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A visual inspection and functional testing of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, the instructions for use, and quality control data.The complainant returned one used ncircle tipless stone extractor, ntse-022115-udh, to cook for inspection.The device was returned with the handle in the open position.The basket and support sheaths were severed 1 mm from the handle.The mlla (male luer lock adapter) was loose, while the collet knob was tight and secure.The polyethylene terephthalate tubing (pett) measured 2.5 cm.One wire in the basket formation was broken, one piece of the wire was missing and not returned.With the handle in the open position, a kink was noted at the cannulated handle and coil junction.2 cm of the cannulated handle was exposed.The support and basket sheaths were still adhered.Kinks were found in the basket sheath 35.8 cm, 60 cm, and 81.2 cm from the distal tip.Functional testing determined that the handle does not actuate the basket formation.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: precaution: enclose the device in the sheath before removing from the tray/holder.Precaution: do not use excessive force to manipulate this device.Damage to the device may occur.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was visually/functionally inspected by quality control and no related gaps in production or processing controls were noted.The extent of the damage to the returned device indicates the device likely experienced excessive force.There may have been procedural factors that led the user the apply to excessive force to the device, but no information related to procedural factors was provided.The cause for the observed damage could not be determined.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|