Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.
|
This complaint is from a literature source.The following complications were reported in this publication: it was reported that a (b)(6) year-old female with a past medical history of hypertension underwent a stent assisted coil embolization about 5 years ago to treat a basilar artery (ba) main trunk aneurysm (neck size, 4.6 mm, dome 7.8 mm, height 8.6 mm) using a 4mmx23mm no tip enterprise 2 stent (enc402300/unknown lot#) and 3 years later experienced aneurysm recanalization.The abstract reports, ¿the aneurysm was again enlarged, so we decided to add a coil embolization using a stent.¿ there are 0 death events and 0 device malfunctions reported in this publication.Model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected device is the enterprise 2 stent.Other cnv webster devices that were also used in this study: none.Non-cnv webster devices that were also used in this study: unknown brand coils.Publication details.Title: a case of recurrent large basilar artery aneurysm treated with overlap stent.Objective: endovascular treatment is often indicated for basilar artery (ba) aneurysm because of difficulty in direct access but the treatment strategy is often difficult.Methods: review of case report.
|