(b)(4). a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformance's were identified. evaluation: visual inspection: the device was not returned in its original packaging.The active ring of the device was confirmed to be missing from the distal end of the electrode.The missing section of the active ring was not returned with the electrode.The remainder of the electrode showed no signs of damage.No connector cable was returned with the electrode.No electrical or functional testing was conducted due to the condition of the device.Closer visual examination was only conducted.Electrical test: no electrical testing conducted due to the condition of the returned device.Functional test: no functional testing conducted; due to the condition of the device.Further investigation: all fracture faces showed evidence of a brittle failure, also there were no signs of an obvious reduction on cross sectional area, indicating a non-mechanical failure mode.It was also worth noting that the fracture surfaces may have been compromised somewhat as activation may have occurred after the actual failure causing the fracture surface to be altered somewhat.No electrical or functional testing was conducted.The condition of the fracture face of the device suggests a brittle failure with no obvious signs of mechanical damage.Instances of similar failures have been seen historically, with the failure location, mode and method indicating failure due to surface (hydrogen) embrittlement.Results of the batch record review: ugy2004012 the device history record for batch referenced above was reviewed for non-conformance's related to the nature of the complaint during the manufacturing process.The results of this review indicate there were zero non-conformance regarding the nature of the complaint associated with this lot.Product release date: april 2020.Product expiry date: april 2025.
|