• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT PRO PLUS DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT PRO PLUS DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number D-EVPROP34US
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 06/17/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: no product was returned.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve using this delivery catheter system (dcs), the dcs was unable to advance through the patient's vasculature.During the attempted advancement of the dcs, a dissection in the right iliac artery and right external iliac artery were reported.The dcs was removed from the body and the dissection was repaired with a stent.The procedure was aborted and a valve was not implanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that the difficulty advancing the dcs occurred in the right external iliac artery.The minimum access vessel diameter was 5.8 mm.Per the physician, the cause of the dissection was unknown.The device code was corrected in section h6.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The method code was updated in section h6.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the delivery catheter system (dcs) was not returned to medtronic, and as such no analysis could be performed.No procedural images were provided for review.Difficulties advancing the dcs is known to be related to procedural factors, user technique, and/or patient anatomy (angulation, cal cification, tortuosity, etc.).In this case, the cause of the difficulty advancing the dcs could not be determined with the information available and a relationship to the dcs cannot be established.Additional information was received that the minimum access vessel diameter was 5.8 millimeter (mm).Per the evolut instructions for use, patients must present with transarterial access vessels with diameters that are greater than 6 mm when using model d-evproplus34us.This indicates off label use.Vascular complications, such as dissection, are known potential adverse patient effects per the evolut system instructions for use (ifu), and are typically related to patient factors (anatomy, comorbidities, etc.), and/or procedural effects (sheath used, user technique, puncture cut location, etc.).In this case, the transaterial access vessels were not within the specifications outlined in the ifu.This indicates the cause of the dissection was likely due to off-label use.A device history record (dhr) review was performed on the dcs and there were no correlations/issues identified regarding manufacturing.The device was manufactured per approved and released manufacturing processes and the device met all applicable manufacturing specifications prior to release for distribution.The dhr review did not show any findings related to this event.There was no information to suggest a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications was related to these events.H6-updated eval method, eval result, eval conclusion and health impact codes medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT PRO PLUS DCS
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
MDR Report Key12075569
MDR Text Key258645589
Report Number2025587-2021-02009
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00763000207861
UDI-Public00763000207861
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/21/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/21/2023
Device Model NumberD-EVPROP34US
Device Catalogue NumberD-EVPROP34US
Device Lot Number0010535036
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/17/2021
Initial Date FDA Received06/28/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/28/2021
06/28/2021
07/19/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/29/2021
06/29/2021
07/21/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
-
-