• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO ENDO CLINCH II; FORCEPS, OBSTETRICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO ENDO CLINCH II; FORCEPS, OBSTETRICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 174317
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Unintended Radiation Exposure (4565)
Event Date 06/16/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a component fell into the patient¿s cavity.An additional operation was performed to complete the case.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the gallbladder was being grasped when a component fell into the patient¿s cavity.It was noticed that the device was missing a screw.The surgeon searched for the screw and the duration of the operation was extended for about 20 minutes but due to the presence of fluid, it was aspirated and was not found.An additional operation was performed to complete the case.An x-ray was taken the day after the operation and showed that the screw was present in the right hypochondrium.A reoperation on (b)(6) by laparoscopy with fluoroscopy to locate the screw and remove it was scheduled and was successfully executed.It was noted the screw was removed from the fat tissues under the liver where the gallbladder was hosted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5, d9, g3, h3, h6 h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device and a photo were available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the jaw of the device was broken at the fulcrum.It was reported that a component disengaged from the device into the surgical cavity, and significant surgical intervention was required due to the product failure.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.Broken jaw may occur when the device is exposed to a side force (leverage) that consequently breaks one side of the jaws.Another possibility is when the device is activated with too much force to the jaws and is used in a twisting motion resulting in breakage.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the gallbladder was being grasped when a component fell into the patient¿s cavity.It was noticed that the device was missing a screw.They searched for the screw for about 20 minutes but due to the presence of fluid, it was aspirated and was not found.An additional operation was performed to complete the case.An x-ray taken the day after the operation unfortunately showed that this screw was present in the body.A reoperation on (b)(6) by laparoscopy with fluoroscopy to locate the screw and remove it was scheduled.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the gallbladder was being grasped when a component fell into the patient¿s cavity.It was noticed that the device was missing a screw.They searched for the screw and the duration of the operation was extended for about 20 minutes but due to the presence of fluid, it was aspirated and was not found.An additional operation was performed to complete the case.An x-ray taken the day after the operation unfortunately showed that this screw was present in the right hypochondrium.A reoperation on (b)(6) by laparoscopy with fluoroscopy to locate the screw and remove it was scheduled.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the jaws of the instrument were damaged.It was reported that a component disengaged/disassociated from the device into the surgical cavity.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.This issue may occur when the device is exposed to a side force (leverage) that consequently breaks one side of the jaws.Another possibility is when the device is activated with too much force to the jaws and is used in a twisting motion resulting in breakage.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDO CLINCH II
Type of Device
FORCEPS, OBSTETRICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer (Section G)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer Contact
tracy landers
5920 longbow drive
boulder, CO 80301
3035816943
MDR Report Key12149813
MDR Text Key260970449
Report Number2647580-2021-02311
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HDA
UDI-Device Identifier10884523000832
UDI-Public10884523000832
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K903205
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number174317
Device Catalogue Number174317
Device Lot NumberP0L1380
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/03/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/18/2021
Initial Date FDA Received07/12/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/17/2021
09/02/2021
09/23/2021
11/29/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/01/2021
09/16/2021
09/30/2021
12/07/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/24/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age41 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight85 KG
-
-