• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RAPID MEDICAL LTD. TIGERTRIEVER REVASCULARIZATION DEVICE; TIGERTRIEVER XL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RAPID MEDICAL LTD. TIGERTRIEVER REVASCULARIZATION DEVICE; TIGERTRIEVER XL Back to Search Results
Model Number TRPP3133
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Stenosis (2263); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 05/21/2021
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
According to the report received by the company, the patient arrived to the hospital in severe condition (multiple occlusions were observed in a number of territories).The ica occlusion was treated with the subject device, however, stenosis was observed throughout the ica that may have been a contributing factor.There is no indication that the device, labeling or packaging failed to meet its specifications when deployed.It could not be conclusively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.Because the review and analysis of all available information failed to identify a specific cause and the device was not returned, an assignable cause of undeterminable' will be assigned to this complaint.
 
Event Description
Adverse event description: rapid medical received a report of an adverse event concerning a tigertriever xl stentriever device, during a procedure in a hospital outside the united states.Although tigertriever xl is not cleared in the us, the event is being reported by the company because the tigertriever xl is in the product family that includes other tigertriever models that are cleared in the us.A (b)(6) year-old female patient presented to the hospital with a left internal carotid artery (ica) occlusion.Several aspiration attempts were made with sophia 6fr aspiration device.Additionally, a trevo stentriever was used prior to use of tigertriever xl.It was reported that reperfusion was achieved in the m1 segment, and partial reperfusion was achieved in the ica segment.Following, the physician attempted a pass with the tigertriever xl.During the first pass attempt, the device became immobilized, and the physician was unable to retrieve it.The physician attempted to advance the microcatheter toward the clot without success.It was reported that the lesion territory may have included stenosis and/or a large segment of atherosclerotic plaque.It was reported that the physician pulled on the device with significant force, causing the wire to fracture and leaving part of the tigertriever xl in the patient's ica.During the procedure, additional strokes were observed in the right cerebrovascular territory.The patient expired three days after the intervention.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TIGERTRIEVER REVASCULARIZATION DEVICE
Type of Device
TIGERTRIEVER XL
Manufacturer (Section D)
RAPID MEDICAL LTD.
carmel building po box 337
yokneam, israel 20692 05
IS  2069205
MDR Report Key12180279
MDR Text Key261909368
Report Number3015531723-2021-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier07290015107198
UDI-Public(01)07290015107198(17)230228(10)201001TX01
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/04/2021,06/17/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2023
Device Model NumberTRPP3133
Device Catalogue NumberTRPP3133
Device Lot Number201001TX01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date06/15/2021
Device Age9 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer06/04/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received07/16/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-