Model Number 1011-85-000 |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
Pain (1994)
|
Event Date 06/17/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Clinical adverse event received for failure of the protrusio cage with acetabular fracture : migration/loosening - polyethylene shell -- inferior tang of cage has fractured and separated, superior tang is intact.The posterior place has also fractured.Greater troch is butted up against the pelvic iliac wing, hip itself is located event is not serious and is considered moderate event is definitely related to device and is definitely not related to procedure.Date of implantation: (b)(6) 2019.Date of revision: (b)(6) 2019 (cup, liner, femoral head, to address a pelvic bone fracture).Date of event (onset): (b)(6) 2021.(right hip).(b)(6) 2021 medical records note the patient is 2 years out from revision surgery for her protrusion and both column acetabular fracture.The patient has a failed cage, it migrated into the pelvis.The patient continues to have a nonunion of her bi-column fracture and failure of her cage.At this time there was no invasive treatment.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint #(b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.Provided x-rays have been reviewed confirming the reported material fracture.It is understood this device, and additional unknown fracture/trauma product was used to repair an earlier pelvic bone fracture for this patient.Patient bone condition and not device error is suspected to be the contributing factor.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the material, manufacturing, inspection or sterile processing that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|