It was reported that in-stent restenosis occurred.The subject was enrolled into the (b)(6) study on (b)(6) 2017 and the index procedure was performed on the same day.The target lesion was located in the left distal superficial femoral artery (sfa) with 80% stenosis.The target lesion was 60 mm long with a proximal reference vessel diameter of 5.5 mm and a distal reference vessel diameter of 5.5 mm.It was classified as a tasc ii a lesion.The target lesion was treated with pre-dilatation using a balloon, followed by placement of a 6 mm x 60 mm study stent.Following post dilation, the residual stenosis was 0%.On (b)(6) 2017, the subject was discharged with antiplatelet therapy.On (b)(6) 2019, 830 days post index procedure, the subject presented due to progression of the disease leading to restenosis of the distal femoral artery on the left side.No action was taken at the time of diagnosis.The subject was recommended to undergo surgical intervention as a treatment for this event on later date.On (b)(6) 2020, the subject was hospitalized for planned intervention.Subject reported the onset of pain in the left lower limb at distances of approximately 200 meters.The subject was diagnosed with stage iib peripheral artery disease (pad) of the left lower limb.On the same day, ultrasound reveled patency at the common femoral and iliac levels.On the left, the superficial femoral stent was patent with, immediately downstream, stenosis seemed to be tight opposite mid left popliteal artery.80% stenosis in left distal sfa with 4.5 mm reference vessel diameter and 25 mm lesion length was treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent was implanted.Postoperative, no complication was noticed, and the final residual stenosis was 0%.On (b)(6) 2020, the event was considered to be recovered/ resolved and the subject was discharged on the same day.
|