Model Number BA28-110/I16-30 |
Device Problems
Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Unintended Movement (3026); Separation Problem (4043)
|
Patient Problem
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Date 07/20/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The devices involved in this event will not be returned for evaluation and remain implanted in the patient.Patient medical records and imaging studies will be requested for further evaluation by a clinical specialist.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.Device iteration is afx with duraply.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was initially treated for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa) with an afx bifurcated stent graft and vela suprarenal proximal extension.Approximately five and a half (5.5) years post initial procedure, the patient presented at routine follow-up with a fabric tear and a component separation; these observations are classified as a type iiib endoleak and iiia endoleak, respectively.The patient is reportedly asymptomatic.It is unknown if the physician plans to re-intervene.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported adverse event/incident was investigated in alignment with endologix operating procedures and work instructions.Where possible, it is endologix practice to make at least three good faith efforts to retrieve a reported adverse event/incident related device as well as medical records and medical imaging.An evaluation of the manufacturing record was completed.A review of the part number/lot number combination needed for device identification shows the device to have been properly manufactured and released in accordance with the device master record.The review confirms there were no manufacturing or processing non-conformities identified that would contribute to the reported adverse event/incident.There are no other equivalent adverse events/incidents for this lot number existing within the endologix complaint handling system.An evaluation of the device could not be completed.The device was not returned to endologix for evaluation because it remains implanted.A clinical evaluation of the adverse event/incident was completed.An examination of medical records and/or medical imaging received by endologix shows the type iiia endoleak is refuted.The type 3b endoleak of the proximal extension and distal main body adverse event/incident is confirmed.This moderately consistent with the reported adverse event/incident.The clinical evaluation also shows reasonable evidence to suggest caudal movement of the proximal extension of 5.2mm occurred that was not included in the event as reported.These findings were discovered during an examination of the 65-month post index ct scan.Procedure related harms, device, user, procedure, or anatomy relatedness of this complaint could not be determined with the medical records available for review.The final patient status was reported as being discharged on the first post-operative day home stable following a secondary endovascular procedure.No additional investigation of this reported adverse event/incident is planned.However, should additional information relevant to the investigation outcome become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Endologix will continue to monitor this and similar adverse events/incidents.Device iteration is afx with duraply.Outcomes attributed to ae ¿ updated describe event or problem - updated awareness date - updated device code: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was initially treated for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa) with an afx bifurcated stent graft and vela suprarenal proximal extension.Approximately five and a half (5.5) years post initial procedure, the patient presented at routine follow-up with a fabric tear and a component separation; these observations are classified as a type iiib endoleak and iiia endoleak, respectively.The patient is reportedly asymptomatic.It is unknown if the physician plans to re-intervene.After the initial report, additional information was provided reporting that reintervention was completed with successful reline of the type iiib endoleak with an afx2 bifurcated stent graft and an afx vela suprarenal.The patient was reported to be doing fine post-reintervention.Subsequently, clinical assessment determined that the reported type iiia endoleak was refuted, and rather a type iiib endoleak of the bifurcated stent graft and proximal extension were confirmed.Additionally, there was evidence to reasonably suggest caudal movement of the proximal extension of 5.2mm occurred that was not included in the event as reported.The movement was discovered during a review of the 65-month post index computerized tomography scan.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|