As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 05/2023).
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one tri-funnel replacement gastrostomy tube 22f with peel-apart sheath handle that appeared to be two halves were received for evaluation.Gross visual, microscopic visual and functional evaluation were performed on the returned device.One electronic photo were provided for evaluation.The investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture issue as a longitudinal rupture was noted on the proximal end of the balloon and the surface around the rupture appeared to be jagged and the photo also confirms the same.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported device dislodgement as the exact circumstances during the reported event were unknown.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.D4 (expiry date: 05/2023).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|