• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE CARDIOFORM SEPTAL OCCLUDER; TRANSCATHETER, SEPTAL OCCLUDER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE CARDIOFORM SEPTAL OCCLUDER; TRANSCATHETER, SEPTAL OCCLUDER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number GSXE0030
Device Problem Migration (4003)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/23/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
No patient specific details have been provided.Therefore, the patient initials reflect the w.L.Gore internal case number.The date of incident is unknown.Therefore, the publication date of the literature article is used as date of incident.Engineering evaluation could not be performed as the device was not returned.The gore® cardioform septal occluder instructions for use includes but is not limited to the following potential device or procedure-related adverse events associated with the use of the occluder: device embolization.
 
Event Description
The literature article: "percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale and secundum atrial septal defects with the gore® cardioform septal occluder: incidence and implications of device wire frame fracture" published by biagio castaldi et al.Was reviewed.The article was published september 23, 2020, in tech science press.The aims of the article was to assess the incidence and clinical significance of wire frame fractures (wff) after gore® cardioform septal occluder (gso) implantation in paediatric patients.77 patients underwent percutaneous transcatheter atrial septal defect (asd)/patent foramen ovale (pfo) closure with gso device between january 1, 2012 and december 31, 2018.In 7 patients the indication was pfo closure, in 70 patients asd closure.Mean patient age was 10.0 ± 3.9 years.In one patient, an embolized 30 mm gso device in pulmonary trunk was detected by a chest x-ray performed after 6 hours from the implantation.This patient underwent successful catheterization with removal of the embolized gso device and subsequent implantation of an competitor device.The patients was asymptomatic at last follow-up examination after 24 months.Wff was detected in a total of 22 (35.4%) gso devices, none of them resulted in any clinical sequelae/patient harm.The author concluded that gso devices are safe and effective for pfo and asd closure.Wff was not associated with clinical sequelae or device instability.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE CARDIOFORM SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Type of Device
TRANSCATHETER, SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Manufacturer (Section D)
W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff AZ 86004
Manufacturer (Section G)
KENDRICK PEAK MPD B/P
4250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
ida simson
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff, AZ 86004
9285263030
MDR Report Key12292617
MDR Text Key265553611
Report Number2017233-2021-02221
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MLV
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P050006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/09/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/09/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberGSXE0030
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/31/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age10 YR
Patient Weight38
-
-