• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC. COMFORT HARD-SOFT SPLINT; THERMOFORM MOUTHGUARD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC. COMFORT HARD-SOFT SPLINT; THERMOFORM MOUTHGUARD Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907)
Event Date 08/10/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been returned.If/when the device is returned an investigation will be carried out and a supplemental report will be submitted.Ethnicity/race: unk: this information not provided when asked.Serial#: applicable with the exception of serial number as the device is manufactured by prescription.Implant date-explant date: is not applicable as the device is manufactured by prescription and not implantable.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had a possible allergic reaction to the comfort hard/soft splint.The location of the reaction intraoral and facial.The reaction was reported as "bumps along gums, swelling lips, and itchy red face." the device was delivered on (b)(6) 2021 and the patient used the device on (b)(6) 2021 with the reaction occurring that night.The patient discontinued the device and used benadryl and the reaction subsided.The patient decided to try once more on the night of (b)(6) 2021 and the reaction reoccurred.Once again, the patient took benadryl and the reaction resolved.The patient has seen an allergist and is allergic to latex and codeine and a history of thyroid disease.With regard to the device: the provider rinsed/cleaned the device with a "cleaning solution." the patient was instructed to rinse the device with water and brush it with her toothbrush.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned, but did not transfer to the investigator.However, a non-visual device investigation has been completed and the results are as follows dhr results: the dhr was reviewed and there was no evidence discovered to indicate that a product defect or non-conformity contributed to the issue.Supplier (erkodent) reviewed the associated material lot and confirmed no manufacturing deviation or abnormality.Lot# e-pro 4.0-11659 (erkoloc-pro) was manufactured from june 8, 2021 and was assigned an expiration of june 2024.Stock product reviewed results: no stock product was available for review since the device was fabricated per physician's prescription only.Investigation methods/results: customer stated the device has been returned but to date has not been received.However, the non-visual device investigation has been completed.Root cause: a root cause for this complaint cannot be explicitly determined.Ifu 9091 rev 4.0 (comfort h/s bite splint instruction for use) states "brush and floss your teeth before use.Rinse mouth well with clean water before inserting the device.If patient uses mouthwash, all traces of mouthwash should be removed by thoroughly rinsing out mouth with water.Rinse bite splint well with clean, cool water before and after use.Clean bite splint with clean, cool water only and let air dry." ifu provides warning "do not clean or soak in mouthwash; do not use denture cleanser, hot water, alcohol, hydrogen peroxide; do not place in direct sunlight".It is possible that reactions could be caused by mouthwash, toothpaste, or soaking material.Per the reported information, the provider rinsed/cleaned the device with a "cleaning solution." additionally, the patient has seen an allergist and is allergic to latex and codeine.Supplier erkodent reviewed the incident details and determined the reaction is most likely allergic.Additionally, erkodent noted a cleaning solution must be seen critically- the solution can be absorbed into the material and can remain for a long time.Glidewell research team and namsa conducted a series of testing on a similar thermoformed sleep device following iso 10993 (biological evaluation of medical devices) and the device was evaluated for potential cytotoxicity, skin irritation, delayed dermal contact sensitization and oral mucosal irritation.The test article was thermoformed with layers of erkodent material (erkoloc-pro and erkodur).The test results were listed below and summarized in biocompatibility report for haley sleep device (rpt 9733 rev 1.0) · for cytotoxicity testing, the test article extract showed no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity.· for skin irritation, there was no erythema and no edema observed on the skin of the animals treated with the test article.· for sensitization testing, the test article extracts showed no evidence of causing delayed dermal contact sensitization.· the test article showed nonirritant to the oral mucosa as compared to the control article.The device materials have been found to be biocompatible through the testing.There was no cytotoxic, sensitization, skin irritation, or oral mucosal irritation found in any of the test articles.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMFORT HARD-SOFT SPLINT
Type of Device
THERMOFORM MOUTHGUARD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC.
2144 michelson drive
irvine CA 92612
Manufacturer (Section G)
PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC.
2144 michelson drive
irvine CA 92612
Manufacturer Contact
herbert crane
2144 michelson drive
irvine, CA 92612
9495021907
MDR Report Key12325244
MDR Text Key266679696
Report Number3011649314-2021-00309
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MQC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K121365
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/25/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/16/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/23/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/10/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age45 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-