• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHYSIO-CONTROL, INC. - 3015876 LUCAS 2 BATTERY CHARGER; EXTERNAL DEVICE BATTERY CHARGER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHYSIO-CONTROL, INC. - 3015876 LUCAS 2 BATTERY CHARGER; EXTERNAL DEVICE BATTERY CHARGER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 11576-000049
Device Problems Fire (1245); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/28/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Physio-control continues to investigate the reported failure and will submit a supplemental report on this event to the fda as provided by 21 cfr 803.56.
 
Event Description
A customer contacted physio-control to report that their battery vented while it was in the battery charger.There was no patient use associated with the reported event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The battery and charger were returned to stryker and were sent to intertek and mascot for evaluation.Through visual evaluation it was confirmed that the battery had swollen up and likely caught fire as evidenced by the excessive burnt battery/charger material.Battery analysis: a 3d scan was performed and it was observed that a hole was pierced through the battery cell at the front of the battery and continuing through the different layers of the cell.The hole appears to have been caused by a pointed object when the battery was either already heated or prior to the event.The customer was contacted regarding the hole and they had informed that the battery and charger were moved into a container using forceps, the puncture could have been caused then, however it could not be confirmed.Due to the state of the battery pack being severely burnt, no further analysis of the cells could be performed.Therefore, it was confirmed that the battery failed, however after evaluation further root cause could not be determined.Charger analysis: the charger was evaluated and was unable to duplicate or verify the reported issue.The voltage output was normal even after the event.During inspection it was observed that the constant current function was not functional, however it was determined that even if the constant current function had been inoperable prior to the reported event, it is unlikely to have caused an event such as this.There is no indication that the charger was the root cause of the reported issue.
 
Event Description
A customer contacted physio-control to report that their battery vented while it was in the battery charger.There was no patient use associated with the reported event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUCAS 2 BATTERY CHARGER
Type of Device
EXTERNAL DEVICE BATTERY CHARGER
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHYSIO-CONTROL, INC. - 3015876
11811 willows road ne
redmond WA 98052
Manufacturer (Section G)
JOLIFE AB - 3005445717
scheelevagen 17
ideon science park
lund SE-22 3 70
SW   SE-223 70
Manufacturer Contact
todd bandy
11811 willows road ne
redmond, WA 98052
4258674000
MDR Report Key12325580
MDR Text Key266702499
Report Number3005445717-2021-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Source Type Foreign
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/31/2021,07/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/16/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number11576-000049
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/31/2021
Device Age0 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer05/31/2021
Date Manufacturer Received06/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-