• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION AVALUS AORTIC TISSUE VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION AVALUS AORTIC TISSUE VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 40017
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
Patient Problems Atrial Fibrillation (1729); Stroke/CVA (1770); Non specific EKG/ECG Changes (1817); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Valvular Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4449)
Event Date 01/05/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: tadokoro n, et al.Comparison of safety and haemodynamic performance between the avalus¿ stented aortic valve bioprosthesis and magna¿ valve in japanese patients.Gen thorac cardiovasc surg.2021 jul;69(7):1060-1069.Doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01566-1.Epub 2021 jan 5.Earliest date of publish used for date of event.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information from a literature article regarding a comparison of the safety and hemodynamic performance between the avalus and magna surgical aortic valves.All data was retrospectively collected from a single center between april 2012 and march 2020.Of the 468 patients included in the study population, 87 patients (predominantly male, median age 73 years) underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with the medtronic avalus.No unique device identifier numbers were provided.Among all avalus patients, adverse events that occurred between valve implant and hospital discharge included: permanent pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome (one case); and minor ischemic cerebrovascular accident with full recovery (one case).Adverse events that occurred within one-year after valve implant included: mild paravalvular leak (three cases); severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (three cases); and congestive heart failure related to atrial fibrillation requiring in-hospital treatment (one case).No additional adverse patient effects or product performance issues were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AVALUS AORTIC TISSUE VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708734
MDR Report Key12328905
MDR Text Key266867958
Report Number2025587-2021-02565
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P170006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/16/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number40017
Device Catalogue Number40017
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/21/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-