Citation: tadokoro n, et al.Comparison of safety and haemodynamic performance between the avalus¿ stented aortic valve bioprosthesis and magna¿ valve in japanese patients.Gen thorac cardiovasc surg.2021 jul;69(7):1060-1069.Doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01566-1.Epub 2021 jan 5.Earliest date of publish used for date of event.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
Medtronic received information from a literature article regarding a comparison of the safety and hemodynamic performance between the avalus and magna surgical aortic valves.All data was retrospectively collected from a single center between april 2012 and march 2020.Of the 468 patients included in the study population, 87 patients (predominantly male, median age 73 years) underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with the medtronic avalus.No unique device identifier numbers were provided.Among all avalus patients, adverse events that occurred between valve implant and hospital discharge included: permanent pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome (one case); and minor ischemic cerebrovascular accident with full recovery (one case).Adverse events that occurred within one-year after valve implant included: mild paravalvular leak (three cases); severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (three cases); and congestive heart failure related to atrial fibrillation requiring in-hospital treatment (one case).No additional adverse patient effects or product performance issues were reported.
|