The returned superion implant 101-9812 lot number 700078 was analyzed and visual inspection revealed slight damage to the spindle.The implant did function acceptably during the functional test.This damage suggests that the user likely exerted excessive force when the spacer was explanted.The returned additional suspect component superion implant 101-9812 lot number 700078 was analyzed and visual inspection revealed a severely stripped screw thread.The implant deployed with slight resistance due to the damaged thread.This damage suggest that the user likely exerted excessive force when the spacer was explanted.With all available information, objective evidence confirmed by x-ray revealed that the spacer migrated.Therefore, device migration was the most likely cause of the reported event of patients original leg pain returning.Additionally, visual inspection revealed slight damage to the spindle, however, the implant did function acceptably during functional test confirming the damage to the implant was determined to have occurred due to an excessive force used during the explant surgery and is unintended use error caused or contributed to the event.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use ifu, and states "migration or dislodgement of the implant from the original position so that it becomes ineffective or causes damage to adjacent bone, or new or worsened back or leg pain" are known inherent risks associated with this procedure.
|