Us legal mdl: it was reported that, after a right bhr construct had been implanted on (b)(6) 2006, the plaintiff experienced a mechanical complication and cobalt and chromium toxicity.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2021 to treat these adverse events.Some brown discoloration of the synovium was found, as well as osteolysis around the acetabulum.The femoral head was explanted and the cup was retained.The hip was revised to a tha with a dual mobility system.There were no intraoperative complications and the patient was taken to the recuperation room in stable condition.
|
H3, h6: it was reported that a right hip revision surgery had been performed.As of today, the implanted devices all of which were used in the treatment, and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.Without definitive lot numbers, a complete complaint history review cannot be performed for the devices involved.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, a manufacturing record review and device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.All of the devices would have met manufacturing specifications.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.Per the surgical technique, the acetabular component is to be impacted with 15-20 degrees of anteversion.However, the revision operative report indicated the acetabular component was noted to be placed at 30 degrees of anteversion.It is unknown if the increased anteversion led to accelerated wear and the reported mechanical complication, cobalt and chromium toxicity, and the intraoperative findings of brown discoloration of the synovium and osteolysis.With the information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported clinical reactions cannot be confirmed.It cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions/events were associated with a mal-performance of the implant or implant failure.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint.The investigation remains inconclusive and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Additionally, specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault cannot be provided due to the insufficient information.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|