Model Number 1261.206 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 07/26/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The malfunctioning device will be returned to vygon for evaluation as part of the complaint investigation.The results of this investigation are pending and will be communicated to fda within 30 days of its conclusion via follow up mdr.
|
|
Event Description
|
After two days the catheter tube ruptured at approx.20 cm; migration of catheter fragment into central venous vessels (thorax); catheterization was required.On (b)(6) 2021 the premicath catheter was placed.During the catheter change ((b)(6) 2021), a bouncy resistance was noticed when pulling out the catheter after 3 cm out of 15 cm, an ultrasound examination does not reveal any evidence for the problem of pulling out.On further attempt, the catheter snapped off and the remaining 12 cm stayed stuck in the blood vessel.On (b)(6) 2021, the remaining catheter is removed in the course of an abdominal operation theatre.The removal of the rest proves to be simple and problem-free.All catheter parts with accessories were retrieved.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
For this complaint, we received the two catheter fragments - the distal approx.11.9 cm piece of tubing, which was surgically removed, and the proximal part of the catheter (catheter tubing in yellow 24g cannula, pink adapter and extension line).Microscopic examination revealed a rough surface at the site of rupture of both catheter fragments, which is typical of a tension rupture.Radial mechanical damage was visible on the proximal catheter tube approximately 0.3 mm proximal to the fracture site.It is unclear at what point this occurred.It can be excluded that the catheter was damaged in this way during production.No fibrin deposits were visible on either of the two pieces of tubing, which could have justified difficult removal.An elongated dried residue (blood, medication?) protruded from the catheter tip.This could be pushed out further and covered a length of approx.3 mm.Other occlusions were visible in the distal catheter piece.There were no abnormalities on checking the batch documentation.A leakage and flow test is performed on each catheter.A tensile strength test is carried out at random as an in-process test.The tensile force of the catheter tube batch involved was 5.3 n and thus within the specification (at least 1.5 n).This is the first complaint regarding batch 101220gn and there have been two further complaints regarding code 1261.206 within the last three years, in which the catheter tube snapped during removal process.No further action is performed by quality management, as there is no hint for a product-related defect.
|
|
Event Description
|
After two days the catheter tube ruptured at approx.20 cm; migration of catheter fragment into central venous vessels (thorax); catheterization was required.On (b)(6) 2021 the premicath catheter was placed.During the catheter change ((b)(6) 2021), a bouncy resistance was noticed when pulling out the catheter after 3 cm out of 15 cm, an ultrasound examination does not reveal any evidence for the problem of pulling out.On further attempt, the catheter snapped off and the remaining 12 cm stayed stuck in the blood vessel.On (b)(6) 2021, the remaining catheter is removed in the course of an abdominal operation theatre.The removal of the rest proves to be simple and problem-free.All catheter parts with accessories were retrieved.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|