|
Model Number RBY2C2060-A |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/03/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the splenic artery using a ruby coil and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance while advancing a ruby coil halfway through the microcatheter.Subsequently, the physician removed the ruby coil to check if the microcatheter was still placed in its correct position.After confirming that the microcatheter was still placed in its correct position and that the microcatheter could be flushed without any problem, the physician re-inserted the ruby coil into the microcatheter.However, while advancing the ruby coil halfway through the microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance again and decided to retract it.While retracting the ruby coil, resistance was encountered and subsequently, the ruby coil detached from its pusher assembly with part of the ruby coil outside the patient and the other part inside the microcatheter.Therefore, the physician was able to pull the detached ruby coil out of the microcatheter.The procedure was completed using two additional ruby coils, two pod packing coils, and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil revealed that the embolization coils proximal constraint sphere was within the pusher assembly ddt, and the embolization coil was unraveled due to the sr wire being fractured.If the device is forcefully retracted against resistance, the sr wire may fracture, and the embolization coil will unravel.Based on the reported complaint, the root cause of resistance during the procedure could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed pusher assembly bends.This damage was likely incidental to the reported complaint.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|