Pma/510(k) # exempt.Device has been returned and preliminary evaluation has been performed, however, our investigation is ongoing and device evaluation summary will be included in our follow up report once our investigation has been completed.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
Summary of event: as reported, two three-way plastic stopcock cracked and leaked liquid when using the device with two syringes.No section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The complainant has not reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection and functional test of the returned devices was also conducted.Two three-way plastic stopcocks were received in a used condition.The first stopcock was observed to be cracked.A leak test was performed by attaching a syringe filled with water to the stopcock.There were two leaks, both originating near the hex nut of the device.A second stopcock was received for this complaint.The second stopcock was found to be leaking just like the first stopcock when tested by injecting water into the stopcock from a syringe.In response to this incident, cook reviewed the device history record (dhr).The dhr for the reported lot records no relevant non-conformances.A database search for complaints on the reported lot found no additional complaints reported from the field.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was also conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was functionally inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Cook has concluded that component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to this incident.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|