• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES BD FACS CALIBUR¿

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES BD FACS CALIBUR¿ Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 343023
Device Problem Contamination (1120)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/13/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device expiration date: na.Initial reporter phone #: (b)(6).A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while running bd facs calibur¿ contamination in sample line was discovered.There was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter, translated from (b)(6) to english: measuring cell contaminated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6.Investigation: ¿ scope of issue: the scope of issue is only limited to facscalibur 4 clr with sort sensor unit, part # 343023, serial # (b)(6).¿ problem statement: customer reported complaint regarding their instrument producing erroneous results.¿ manufacturing defect trend: there are zero qns (quality notifications) related to the reported issue.Date range from (b)(6) 2020 to (b)(6) 2021.¿ complaint trend: there are (b)(4) complaints related to the issue of erroneous results.Date range from (b)(6) 2020 to (b)(6) 2021.¿ manufacturing device history record (dhr) review: dhr part # 343023 serial # (b)(6), file # (b)(4), was reviewed.The instrument met all the manufacturing specifications prior to release.¿ investigation result / analysis: the investigation was performed and based on the review of the complaint trend, defect trend, dhr, risk analysis and servicemax, the root cause of the carryover between sample tests was due to a worn flowcell assembly.The customer initially reported that the instrument was exhibiting carryover, and an estimate was provided that detailed the travel, labor, and cost of the flowcell (pn 02-61849-01s) needed for the repair.The customer then informed the tsr (technical service representative) that they were not interested in repairing the instrument due to the instrument¿s age.No parts were requested for evaluation as there were no parts replaced.Although the erroneous results were of patient samples, these erroneous results did not delay or otherwise affect the treatment of any patient.The safety risk is limited, s2, and there was no impact to patient health or safety.¿ service max review: review of related work order #: (b)(4), case # (b)(4).Install date: (b)(6) 2001.Defective part number: n/a.Work order notes: o subject / reported: calibur measuring cell.O problem description: measuring cell contaminated.1 x 02-61849-01s.4h az.1 h rz.Small flat rate.O work performed: n/a.O cause: n/a.O solution: the customer does not want to repair the device due to its age and possible new purchases.¿ returned sample evaluation: a return sample was not requested because there were no parts replaced.¿ risk analysis: risk management file part # 342973ra, rev.04/vers.D, bd facscalibur product family risk analysis was reviewed.No new hazards have been identified and the current mitigation is sufficient.Hazard(s) identified? yes no.O id: 3.1.4.O hazard: operational hazard ¿ fl3 separation qc failure.O cause: fl3 filter¿s optical characteristic is not optimal.O harmful effects: cannot proceed with clinical results after qc failure.O risk control: new fl3 filer to optimize optical characteristics.O implementation verification: verification protocol and report vp12256.O effectiveness verification: 500000189287.O probability: 1.O severity: 3.O risk index: 3.O residual risk evaluation: a.O new hazards: none.Mitigation(s) sufficient yes no.¿ root cause: based on the investigation results the root cause of the carryover between samples was due to a worn flowcell.¿ conclusion: based on the investigation results the root cause of the carryover between samples was due to a worn flowcell.An estimate for the flowcell, travel, and labor costs needed for an fse to repair the instrument was provided to the customer.After receiving this information the customer informed the tsr that they were not interested in repairing this instrument at the moment.No one was harmed or injured, and there was no impact to the treatment of any patients due to the erroneous results.The safety risk is moderate, s3, and there was no impact to patient health or safety.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while running bd facs calibur¿ contamination in sample line was discovered.There was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter, translated from german to english: measuring cell contaminated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD FACS CALIBUR¿
Type of Device
NA
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES
2350 qume drive
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES
2350 qume drive
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
katie swenson
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key12442673
MDR Text Key274339453
Report Number2916837-2021-00368
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GKZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/06/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number343023
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/13/2021
Initial Date FDA Received09/08/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/06/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/15/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/11/2016
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-