• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 505DA18
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 08/13/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been returned and analysis is in progress.Upon completion of analysis, a supplemental report will be submitted.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that after suturing this 18mm mechanical valve into place, the surgeon checked the motion of the mechanical leaflets and it was observed that leaflet of the valve was "fractured".The valve was explanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory.Visual examination revealed, that both leaflets were in the closed position.A blue actuator was used to test leaflet movement, the leaflets moved without difficulty.One leaflet was intact with no evidence of damages, such as cracks or surface anomalies.The other leaflet exhibited a fracture on the edge.The fracture suggests possible grasping by an instrument (e.G.: forceps).The orifice was intact with no defects observed.Both hinge mechanisms were intact with no evidence of damage.Conclusion: the investigation is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted, after completion of the investigation.H3: device evaluated? updated.H6: coding updated.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: additional visual inspection of the right leaflet showed a visible fracture around the major radius.No other visual observations were made about either leaflet or the orifice.The components appeared to meet all visual manufacturing specifications.Dimensional analysis showed all in process critical dimensions met the required specifications at the time of component production.Dimensional data from the device history record¿s for each component were confirmed.The orifice was remeasured and met the required manufacturing specifications.The device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Based on the analysis and the reported information, a conclusive cause of the leaflet fractures cannot be determined.There are several potential causes could cause the leaflet fracture / damage: using other instruments for valve rotation applied excessive force while rotating the valve leaflets ¿ rotated the valve using the leaflet rather than using the rotator and the twisting of the leaflet broke the leaflet.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC AP
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key12452769
MDR Text Key270790371
Report Number2025587-2021-02780
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P990046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/10/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number505DA18
Device Catalogue Number505DA18
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/09/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/28/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-