Exact date of event is unknown; september 08, 2012 is the date the literature article was published.This report is for an unknown viper 2 pedicle screw fixation construct/unknown lot.Part and lot number are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: hassan m.F., mohamed m.B., wynne-jones g.A.,(2012) minimally invasive spinal fixation for spinal infection, british journal of neurosurgery volume 26, page 613- 614, (united kingdom).This retrospective study aims to report the initial experience with a minimally invasive approach with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in patients deteriorating on antibiotic therapy.A total of eight patients were treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (viper 2, depuy spine, raynham, ma), mean age at surgery was 60.4 years (range 24 ¿ 85 years).Mean follow-up was 6.6 months (range 4 ¿ 11 months).The following complications were reported as follows: there was one post-operative complication of a wound infection that required further debridement.This report is for an unknown viper 2 pedicle screw fixation construct.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|