• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Gradient Increase (1270); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
Patient Problems Dyspnea (1816); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 07/29/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Stenosis, which develops progressively over time, can be due to a number of issues.Additionally, there can be a number of potential known and unknown patient related contributing factors.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explants and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly, may contribute to stenosis and/or regurgitation.Alternatively, the nonstructural dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.The subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 25mm 11500a aortic valve implanted in pulmonary position for 1 year and 8 months underwent a valve-in-valve procedure due to stenosis and regurgitation.The procedure was performed with a 29mm 9600tfx transcatheter valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated sections: b5, b6, b7, d4 expiration date and udi, h4 and h6 health effect - clinical code and type of investigation.The device history record was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 25mm 11500a aortic valve implanted in pulmonary position for 1 year and 8 months underwent a valve-in-valve procedure due to moderate stenosis and mild to moderate insufficiency and associated severe rv dilation.The patient is sob with mild exertion.The procedure was performed with a 29mm 9600tfx transcatheter valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated section: h6 investigation findings and investigation conclusions.Through further investigation, it was determined that the root cause of this event was most likely due to patient related factors.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Journal article: transcatheter pulmonary valve-in-valve implantation within the expandable inspiris resilia bioprosthetic valve by bativala et al., 2022, received on 01/20/2022.Based on the information available, the device was intentionally used outside the way it was designed and intended.The performance, safety, efficacy, longevity, and durability of rings and bioprosthetic valves have not been determined when the product is used outside the scope of its intended use and/or its studied population.Tissue degeneration-related structural deterioration, either calcific or non-calcific, are common chronic failure modes for this type of bioprosthetic heart valve.Operational mechanical stress and biological factors are generally believed to be the major contributors to the non-calcific bioprosthetic tissue degeneration.Structural valve deterioration can, and typically does, lead to chronic central leaks over a period of time.Svd is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explant and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, noncalcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly.Degeneration-related structural deterioration is most commonly related to patient factors and is not usually an indication of a device malfunction.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 25mm 11500a aortic valve implanted in pulmonary position for 1 year and 8 months underwent a valve-in-valve procedure due to leaflets frozen in a nearly open position, with moderate stenosis and mild to moderate insufficiency and associated severe rv dilation.The patient is sob with mild exertion.The procedure was performed with a 29mm 9600tfx transcatheter valve.Additional information received through review of journal article related to this case: intracardiac echocardiography (ice) was performed initially and demonstrated that two of the bpv leaflets were frozen in a nearly open position, resulting in the mixed dysfunction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
gail warner
1 edwards way
ant 6.1
irvine, CA 92614
9492504096
MDR Report Key12465431
MDR Text Key271304670
Report Number2015691-2021-04822
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/13/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/29/2021
Device Model Number11500A
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/30/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age14 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-