Fields updated: b4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h6.Fields corrected: h1 (malfunction event).A complete manufacturing and material records review for the perceval valve model pvs25 and sn:(b)(6) has been performed.The results confirmed that the device satisfied all material, visual and performance standards required at the time of manufacture and release.The lot# of the dual holder involved is reportedly unknown and thus the manufacturing documents for the accessory could not be reviewed.The manufacturer received the dual holder and the perceval valve on 16 nov 2021.Further investigation will be performed and a supplement report will be provided upon completion of the investigation.
|
Corrected data: d1, d2, d4.The device involved in the reported event has been properly updated.The event reports a potential issue with the accessory (i.E.Difficulties in the deployment) as updated in the dedicated sections.Corrected h6 - device problem code.Fields update: b4, g3, g6, h1, h2, h6.The valve and dual holder were returned to the manufacturer.After decontamination, the valve and accessories were visually inspected without identifying pre-existing defects.The dual holder was in general good conditions except the silicon sheath on the tip damaged, and it was freely moving in the close and open position.The height of each leaflet of the valve was checked using the specific tool and led to compliance.In order to attempt to replicate the reported event, a simulation of collapsing and deployment phases was performed, using the returned pvs 25/l with the returned dual holder (after replacement of the silicon sheath).No problems were encountered positioning the valve and during the collapsing phase.During the simulation of the valve deployment in silicon aortic roots #25 and #23 no problems were encountered during the ballooning phase: the sealing at the annulus level is guaranteed; thus, the valve remained fixed within the annulus.Then, inserting some water in the aortic roots from the outflow side, no paravalvular leaks were observed during both the simulations.Considering the static conditions of the test and despite the residual deformation observed at the inflow side level, the water level remained stable under the leaflets free edge.Furthermore, a complete manufacturing and material records review for the accessory has been performed.The results confirmed that the accessory satisfied all material, visual and performance standards required at the time of manufacture and release.Based on the performed analyses, it is possible to exclude the relationship between the reported event and the returned devices quality.The root cause of the deployment difficulty may be related to procedural/use difficulty that led to valve mispositioning.
|