Us legal.It was reported that, after a bhr resurfacing construct had been implanted on the plaintiff¿s left hip on (b)(6) 2010, the plaintiff experienced disabling left hip, groin pain caused by left hip arthroplasty failure and femoral component failed into varus.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2016 to treat this adverse event.Intraoperatively, it was noticed that the femoral component was loose.Patient was brought to recovery room in stable condition.
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in said revision, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the femoral head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.Similar complaints have been identified and this failure will continue to be monitored.On account of the fact devices reportedly involved in this incident were not returned for evaluation, the relevant production records were reviewed.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.No further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The reported pain and varus position of the femoral component are consistent with the loose femoral component noted intraoperatively.However, with the information provided the clinical root cause of the loose femoral component cannot be confirmed and it cannot be concluded that the reported events were associated with a malperformance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the applicable devices or further information we cannot advance the investigation or confirm the details supplied in this complaint.Furthermore, our investigation remains inconclusive and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Due to the insufficient information provided, we are unable to determine specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.If the devices or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.H6: update codes.
|