• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number 4002C2060
Device Problems Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/19/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2021-02075.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the right internal carotid artery (ica) to treat a carotid cavernous fistula (ccf) using penumbra coil 400 (pc400s), a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim), and a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max).During the procedure, while advancing a pc400 through the px slim, the physician experienced resistance.Next, the physician thought there must be some slack in the px slim and relieved it by pulling the px slim slightly back; however, no slack was observed via fluoroscopy.Subsequently, the pc400 unintentionally detached halfway out the distal end of the px slim with that part of the coil in the target vessel.Therefore, the physician successfully removed part of the detached pc400 using a snare device, and some with the help of aspiration and a stent retriever.It was reported that while removing the detached pc400, the pc400 broke into pieces.Next, the physician advanced another pc400 into the target vessel.While forming the pc400, the physician experienced resistance and subsequently, the pc400 unintentionally detached.It was reported that the physician was unable to remove the detached pc400; however, a string like portion of the pc400 was pulled out of the px slim.The remaining part of the detached pc400 was left in the ccf and was thrombosed.Afterwards, the physician made multiple attempts to remove the detached pc400 using a snare device but was unsuccessful since the coil mass was obstructing access.Consequently, another physician attempted to remove the detached pc400 but was also unsuccessful.Therefore, the detached pc400 was left in situ.The procedure was completed by gaining access through the middle meningeal artery and using non-adhesive liquid embolic agent to close the ccf.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA COIL 400
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key12485674
MDR Text Key271904972
Report Number3005168196-2021-02074
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548010762
UDI-Public00814548010762
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,09/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number4002C2060
Device Catalogue Number4002C2060
Device Lot NumberF102343
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/24/2021
Initial Date FDA Received09/16/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/25/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
-
-