Updated fields: d4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h4, h6, h10 the perforator was returned for evaluation: dhr - there is no indication that the production process may have contributed to this complaint.All test results passed procedural specifications.Failure analysis - the perforator unit was inspected using the unaided eye.Unit was lightly soiled with organic material, but no other anomalies were observed.Ifu testing was performed with no observed anomalies.Functional testing was performed using the same protocol it underwent at finished goods testing prior to release and the unit was found to perform as intended and fulfilled the acceptance criteria.The complaint could not be verified through failure analysis.The root cause is undetermined and was unable to be confirmed in the complaint evaluation.
|