It was reported that the 6.5x40 supera self expanding system (sess) was deployed first in the superficial femoral artery (sfa), which occluded the profunda femoris artery.A 3.5x48mm xience xpedition stent delivery system (sds) was attempted to be advanced through the supera stent to open the profunda; however, the sds kept getting caught on the supera stent struts.The sds was removed and the procedure was completed with a non-abbott device.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.The reported patient effect of occlusion is listed in the supera peripheral stent system instructions for use as a potential adverse effect of peripheral percutaneous intervention.The investigation determined the reported difficult to advance appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that as the 3.5x48mm xience xpedition stent delivery system was attempted to be advanced through the supera stent interaction of devices resulted in the reported difficult to advance.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.However, the treatment appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|